Figures show that the number of children living in poverty will increase because of the government's changes to the benefits system and tax credits. The Institute of Fiscal Studies project 800,000 more children will be living in poverty by 2020 because of the coalition's welfare cuts. On top this a further 200,000 children could fall below the poverty line because of the benefit uprating changes (increasing benefits by 1% instead of at the rate of inflation).
At the same time as pushing through these changes the Government has also been consulting on how child poverty should be measured. This has been seen as a way to downplay the importance of income in measuring poverty, the government arguing that other social and economic factors should be included in a single 'multidimensional' measure of poverty. I disagree with this approach. Attempts to redefine measures of child poverty which downplay the importance of an adequate income as a central measure should be resisted.
This critique of the Government's approach and consultation by Alison Garnham of Child Poverty Action Group is worth reading.
The Leicester Child Poverty Commission which I chair has also responded to the Government consultation, the response can be read here.
The Leicester Child Poverty Commission Report, with 66 recommendations on tackling child poverty and its worst impacts, can be found on the Your Britain website. I hope people will comment and share their thoughts. Reducing child poverty has to be a central theme of Labour's thinking as we develop policy solutions to the challenges we are seeing today.
In February the End Child Poverty campaign published the child poverty rate for each local authority and parliamentary constituency in the country. Of course data at local authority and constituency level does not tell the full story; areas with overall relatively low levels often have wards where rates of child poverty are extremely high.
I have set out the data for the East Midlands below:
Child Poverty by local authority in the East Midlands
Amber Valley
|
15%
|
Ashfield
|
20%
|
Bassetlaw
|
16%
|
Blaby
|
7%
|
Bolsover
|
20%
|
Boston
|
16%
|
Broxtowe
|
12%
|
Charnwood
|
11%
|
Chesterfield
|
18%
|
Corby
|
18%
|
Daventry
|
9%
|
Derby City
|
22%
|
Derbyshire Dales
|
7%
|
East Lindsey
|
19%
|
East Northamptonshire
|
10%
|
Erewash
|
16%
|
Gedling
|
13%
|
Harborough
|
5%
|
High Peak
|
11%
|
Hinckley & Bosworth
|
10%
|
Kettering
|
13%
|
Leicester City
|
29%
|
Lincoln
|
22%
|
Mansfield
|
21%
|
Melton
|
8%
|
Newark & Sherwood
|
14%
|
North East Derbyshire
|
13%
|
North Kesteven
|
8%
|
North West Leicestershire
|
11%
|
Northampton
|
18%
|
Nottingham City
|
32%
|
Oadby & Wigston
|
11%
|
Rushcliffe
|
5%
|
Rutland
|
5%
|
South Derbyshire
|
11%
|
South Holland
|
13%
|
South Kesteven
|
11%
|
South Northamptonshire
|
Below 5%
|
Wellingborough
|
16%
|
West Lindsey
|
13%
|
Amber Valley
|
18%
|
Ashfield
|
21%
|
Bassetlaw
|
16%
|
Bolsover
|
20%
|
Boston & Skegness
|
18%
|
Bosworth
|
10%
|
Broxtowe
|
11%
|
Charnwood
|
7%
|
Chesterfield
|
18%
|
Corby
|
14%
|
Daventry
|
9%
|
Derby North
|
19%
|
Derby South
|
27%
|
Derbyshire Dales
|
7%
|
Erewash
|
18%
|
Gainsborough
|
13%
|
Gedling
|
14%
|
Grantham & Stamford
|
12%
|
Harborough
|
8%
|
High Peak
|
11%
|
Kettering
|
13%
|
Leicester East
|
24%
|
Leicester South
|
28%
|
Leicester West
|
34%
|
Lincoln
|
19%
|
Loughborough
|
14%
|
Louth & Horncastle
|
17%
|
Mansfield
|
21%
|
Mid Derbyshire
|
8%
|
Newark
|
11%
|
North East Derbyshire
|
13%
|
North West Leicestershire
|
11%
|
Northampton North
|
20%
|
Northampton South
|
22%
|
Nottingham East
|
33%
|
Nottingham North
|
37%
|
Nottingham South
|
24%
|
Rushcliffe
|
5%
|
Rutland & Melton
|
7%
|
Sherwood
|
16%
|
Sleaford & North Hykeham
|
8%
|
South Derbyshire
|
11%
|
South Holland & The Deepings
|
12%
|
South Leicestershire
|
6%
|
South Northamptonshire
|
5%
|
Wellingborough
|
15%
|
Data from End Child Poverty, February 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.